国产精品成人午夜电影,欧美午夜特黄aaaaaa片,久久亚洲日韩看片无码,亚洲444kkkk在线观看

Unitalen Representing "DR. MARTENS" First Won Judicial Determination of a Famous Trademark, and "馬丁靴(Martin Boots)" Determined Not to Be a Common Name for Footwear and Boots Goods

August 28, 2024

Case Brief

The plaintiff, Airwair International Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Airwair" or "the plaintiff"), as the exclusive global authorized licensee of the "Dr. Martens" series of trademarks, including the No. 584207 international registered trademark, is responsible for the design, production, promotion, and sale of the series of products of the brand "Dr. Martens" in China. Since the 1960s, "Dr. Martens" footwear and boots products have been sold in more than 80 countries and regions worldwide, one of the most recognizable footwear trademark brands in the world. Since 2003, "DR. MARTENS" and its products have been advertised and reported by the Chinese newspapers and media. In 2007, the brand "Dr. Martens" entered the Chinese market, with its sales areas covering all over the country. The brand has enjoyed high popularity in China.

The defendant, Hu, the legal representative of a clothing company in Shantou, filed an application in July 2011 and obtained the approval in June 2012 for registration of the No. 9780715 "Dr. mannar" trademark for use on the same goods "clothing; footwear" as the authorized trademark. The defendant, the clothing company in Shantou, sold footwear and boots products on Tmall, Taobao, 1688 and other e-commerce platforms, and used the infringing marks such as "馬丁(Martin)", "馬丁靴(Martin Boots)", "馬丁鞋(Martin Shoes)", "MARTIN", and "Dr. Mannar" on the homepages of the stores, the linked webpages of the goods, the packaging of the shoe boxes, the wrapping paper and other places. Airwair filed a lawsuit with the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court on the grounds that the aforementioned acts of the defendant constituted trademark infringement.

Determination of the Court

Upon trial, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court held that the plaintiff, by virtue of the authorization, is entitled to conduct sales and promotion concerning the No. G584207 trademark "DR. MARTENS" (hereinafter referred to as "the authorized trademark") in China and to file a civil lawsuit on the basis of the license. The authorized trademark has enjoyed a high reputation in China after a long period of advertisement, use and promotion, and has already become a famous trademark in the goods of "footwear, boots and clothing" on which it is approved for registration. Further, the sued infringing goods also pertain to footwear and boots goods, and because the defendant Hu has registered the No. 9780715 trademark for "Dr. Mannar", it is necessary to obtain the determination of the famous trademark in this case. The sued "Dr. mannar" "Dr. Mannar馬丁靴(Martin Boots)", "", "" and other marks are similar to the plaintiff's authorized trademarks "Dr. Martens", "馬丁(Martin) Dr. MARTENS", "", etc., in terms of the letter composition, pronunciation, and Chinese and English meanings. The clothing company in Shantou used the sued marks on footwear and boots goods and sold them on various online shopping platforms. Such act would easily make the relevant public believe that the goods have the same source or there is a close connection between their sources, and thus may easily confuse the public with source of the goods. In addition, there was no evidence in the case that the term "馬丁靴(Martin Boots)" is a legal or conventionally used common name. On the contrary, various advertisements and reports concerning the authorized trademark can all reflect that the term "馬丁靴(Martin Boots)" corresponds to or is directed to the authorized trademark, which has formed a certain correspondence with the authorized trademark. Therefore, the sued acts constitute an infringement of the authorized trademark.

In the end, the court ruled that the clothing company in Shantou and Hu should cease the infringement immediately and eliminate the influence and that punitive damages should be applied to fully support the litigation request for compensation of 3 million yuan by Airwair. This case is now in its second trial.

Typical Significance

This case is a typical case for a famous trademark to combat malicious registration and infringing acts, which helps deter the malicious infringing acts of "free-riding" in the market.

 

Keywords

天天在线看无码av片| 日本一道一区二区视频| 久久久精品久久久久久96| 日韩av高清在线看片| 精品一区二区av天堂| 久久www成人_看片免费不卡| 失禁潮痉挛潮喷av在线无码| 国产高清在线精品二区 | 超碰97人人做人人爱少妇| 97伦伦午夜电影理伦片| 久久99精品久久只有精品| 日本一卡2卡3卡4卡无卡免费网站| 奇米精品视频一区二区三区| 亚洲暴爽av人人爽日日碰| 国产成人av综合久久视色| 亚洲精品成人无码中文毛片| 一二三四视频社区在线播放中国| 在线无码视频观看草草视频| 无尺码精品产品网站| 亚洲欧美伊人久久综合一区二区 | 日韩亚洲精品国产第二页| 免费国产又色又爽又黄的网站 | 人妻无码中文字幕永久在线| 亚洲 日本 欧美 中文幕| 无码av最新高清无码专区| 高清乱码一区二区三区| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码久久网| 少妇被粗大的猛烈进出| 青青草原精品资源站久久| 无码视频一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网站在线播放无码| 无码人妻久久久一区二区三区| 国产性色播播毛片| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天5| 波多野结av在线无码中文免费| 18禁肉肉无遮挡无码网站| 中文在线天堂网www| 日本免费一区二区三区最新vr| 亚洲国产一二三精品无码| 亚洲精品一区二区三区影院| 男人一边吃奶一边做爰免费视频|